But the description of the circumstances and the timing (around the time of the Washington DC tea party) raises a strong suspicion that anti-government sentiment may have been the motivation.I said Charles is now the Dan Rather of the Blogosphere back in September because of this insinuation. Now that Charles' disgusting insinuation has been proven wrong, he doesn't have the decency to apologize.
Since this news came out, I’ve received several angry emails demanding that I apologize for saying Sparkman had been murdered by a right wing extremist.You implied it, Charles. It's plain as day. This lumps you in with certain Kos diarists, Obama Birthers and 9/11 Truthers. And Andrew Sullivan.
The problem is, I never wrote anything like that. For the record, this was my post when the story broke, and I don’t apologize for a single word.